Executive project brief · anaerobic digestion and BioCNG · India

From organic-waste liability to governed bioenergy infrastructure.

GFIS presents the technical, digital, commercial and implementation architecture required to develop a distributed anaerobic-digestion and BioCNG programme. All commercial figures below are editable pre-feasibility allowances—not vendor quotations or an investment offer.

Proposal classPre-feasibility

Not a DPR or investment solicitation.

Demonstration geographySolapur

Hub-and-spoke scenario; field survey pending.

Digital assuranceSCADA + MRV

Evidence memory from plant edge to national portfolio.

Scheme alignmentMNRE WTE

Current scheme terms must be reverified at submission.

Decision sought

Authorize a measured pre-feasibility and pilot-development programme.

The immediate request is not construction funding. It is approval to validate feedstock, shortlist land, conduct laboratory BMP/TS/VS/COD studies, obtain process and EPC quotations, complete statutory screening and produce a lender-reviewable DPR.

Stage 0190-day evidence programmesurvey · sampling · site screening · offtake discovery
Stage 02Pilot / reference plant DPRprocess guarantee · HAZOP · CAPEX/OPEX · financing
Stage 03District portfolio replicationonly after measured performance and acceptance tests

Technology architecture

One governed chain from waste receipt to verified energy.

Input → process → evidence → output
01

Feedstock assurance

Weighbridge, source contract, contamination inspection, TS/VS/COD/BMP and seasonal mass balance.

Verified tonnes/day
02

Preparation

Segregation, depackaging, size reduction, pulping, dilution and controlled feed buffering.

Conditioned organic slurry
03

Anaerobic conversion

Heated and mixed digestion governed by HRT, OLR, temperature, pH, VFA/ALK and gas quality.

Raw biogas + digestate
04

Gas upgrading

H₂S and moisture removal, CO₂ separation, compression, storage, custody metering and safe flare.

BioCNG / energy export
05

GFIS assurance

SCADA historian, physics-guided forecasting, alarms, experiment memory, MRV and portfolio reporting.

Auditable operating evidence
Technology boundary: GFIS is the planning, intelligence, simulation and evidence layer. PLC/SIS/ESD, process package design, pressure systems and safety-certified control remain under qualified engineering authorities and OEMs.

Illustrative commercial architecture

Uses of funds, operating budget and financing logic.

₹ crore · replace with quotations

Reference planning case

Capital-use categoryAllowanceRequired confirmation
Land development and civil works₹1.25 CrSurvey, geotechnical and local civil BOQ
Reception and feed preparation₹0.95 CrWaste composition and OEM sizing
Digestion, heating and mixing₹2.20 CrGuaranteed process package quotation
Gas cleaning, upgrading and compression₹1.75 CrRaw-gas flow/composition and delivery pressure
Utilities, electrical, flare and fire safety₹0.85 CrSLD, load list and safety engineering
Instrumentation, SCADA, laboratory and GFIS₹0.55 CrInstrument index, cybersecurity and calibration plan
Engineering, approvals, contingency and IDC₹1.10 CrDelivery route, schedule and financing terms
Total planning allowance₹8.65 CrIllustrative only; no investment reliance
Annual operating costBuild from evidence

Feedstock logistics, manpower, parasitic power, heat, media, maintenance, laboratory, insurance and digestate handling.

Revenue stackContract before claim

BioCNG/power offtake, gate fee where lawful, digestate product and verified environmental attributes.

Lender outputsDSCR · IRR · NPV

Calculate only after yield guarantee, uptime, price, escalation, debt tenor, tax and replacement reserve are fixed.

Development programme

A controlled path from evidence to commissioning.

Indicative schedule
0–3 months

Pre-feasibility

Feedstock survey, sampling, sites, utilities, offtake and stakeholder map.

3–6 months

DPR + FEED

Mass-energy balance, OEM quotes, HAZOP, permits, finance and procurement strategy.

6–18 months

EPC delivery

Detailed engineering, civil works, equipment, FAT/SAT and operator readiness.

18–24 months

Commissioning

Biological ramp-up, performance testing, acceptance and evidence baseline.

Post acceptance

Portfolio scale

Replicate only with measured lessons, standard designs and district-level controls.

Project-development stage gates

Nothing becomes “bankable” by changing a label.

Evidence-controlled
01Concept definitionGFIS scope, Level 1/2 contract, project objectives
02Pre-feasibilityScenario sizing, candidate sites, monitoring architecture
03Field investigationFeedstock survey, land, utilities, TS/VS/COD/BMP
04DPR and financeVendor quotes, CAPEX/OPEX, offtake, lender model
05Approvals and HAZOPStatutory matrix, process safety, emergency philosophy
06EPC and commissioningFAT/SAT, performance test, operator training

Level 1 Concept

National plant distribution engine

The Level 1 student project frames GFIS as an AI-driven planning system for rural Maharashtra and national expansion. It combines geospatial AI, methane-yield ML, computer vision feedstock classification and IoT monitoring.

  • Identify high-feedstock villages and taluka clusters.
  • Score candidate sites using livestock, crop waste, roads, grid, water and market access.
  • Run K-Means clustering for hub/spoke distribution.
  • Estimate methane and carbon-credit potential for each plant cluster.
  • Send operational plants into Level 2 PIML monitoring.

Suitability Model

Plant Viability Score

Score = 0.40F + 0.25I + 0.20E + 0.15V

F = feedstock availability, I = infrastructure access, E = economics, V = environmental suitability. This is the planning layer before the Level 2 reactor intelligence begins.

Current viability--

Industrial proposal dossier

Required evidence package

DPR inputs · not invented values
01

Executive and institutional case

Promoter, beneficiaries, implementing agency, ownership/SPV, project boundary and procurement route.

02

Feedstock assurance

Thirty-day compositional sampling, seasonal availability, competing uses, contamination, contracts and delivered cost.

03

Site and logistics

Surveyed coordinates, land title, buffers, flood risk, road movement, water, power, digestate and gas evacuation.

04

Process design basis

Feed TS/VS/COD/BMP, HRT/OLR, reactor type, gas yield, upgrading, storage, flare and mass-energy balance.

05

Electrical and instrumentation

SLD, load list, MCC/VFD, instrument index, cause-and-effect, historian, calibration and cybersecurity zones.

06

Safety and compliance

HAZID/HAZOP, hazardous-area classification, gas detection, relief/flare, fire protection, permits and emergency response.

07

Commercial model

Vendor-backed CAPEX/OPEX, financing, tax, escalation, gas/power/offtake, digestate revenue and sensitivity cases.

08

Delivery and performance

WBS, schedule, quality plan, FAT/SAT, commissioning, performance guarantees, O&M staffing and spares.

SCADA and MRV architecture

Minimum connected instrument register

Tag familyMeasured purpose
FT / FQIFeed, raw biogas, upgraded gas, flare and export flow with totalisation
AITCH₄, CO₂, H₂S, O₂, moisture and—where applicable—CO/H₂ syngas composition
TT / PT / LTDigester/gasifier temperature, pressure, storage level and equipment protection
pHT / laboratorypH plus governed VFA, alkalinity, TS, VS, COD and BMP sampling
Power / weatherImport/export energy, parasitic load, ambient temperature and rainfall context
CMMS / eventsAlarm, trip, downtime, maintenance, calibration and operator-action evidence

Industrial evidence credit · DS-06

Muscatine WRRF laboratory, operational and SCADA dataset

Creators: Hunter W. Schroer and Craig L. Just. Publisher: University of Iowa. Published: 3 January 2024. DOI: 10.25820/data.006715. Licence: Open Data Commons Attribution (ODC-By) v1.0.

GFIS uses a lossless selected-column index of 500,400 one-minute SCADA records collected between 18 March 2022 and 28 February 2023 for industrial replay and data-quality study. The source Biogas channel is total biogas in CFM; it is never relabelled as methane.

Schroer, H. W., & Just, C. L. (2024). Laboratory, operational, and SCADA datasets for anaerobic co-digestion at the Muscatine, IA Water Resource Recovery Facility. University of Iowa. https://doi.org/10.25820/data.006715

ML Location Prediction

Candidate plant clusters

Awaiting run

Government Proposal Story

Business case

GFIS can be presented to government as a planning-and-monitoring platform: Level 1 selects where plants should be installed; Level 2 monitors and simulates plant operation; the legal/IP package protects GFIS software, brand and deployment logic.

LayerGovernment value
Village GIS scoringObjective plant placement and subsidy targeting
District hubsCentral monitoring of 50-200 plants per hub
ML yield forecastingEnergy planning and revenue estimation
IoT monitoringFailure prevention, audit trail and service accountability
Carbon accountingMRV-ready reporting for climate finance

IP and Copyright Position

GFIS ownership documents

The pack includes GFIS copyright registration/application documents and author NOC copies from the legacy GreenWorks legal folder. Use this as evidence that GFIS is being treated as protected software/IP, while final legal claims should be checked by counsel.

Generated proposal note

Export-ready summary